-
By Dean Gonsowski |
May 23, 2012
Those old enough to have watched TV in the early ’80s will undoubtedly remember the FRAM oil commercial in which the mechanic utters his iconic catchphrase: "You can pay me now, or pay me later."
-
By Wayne Wong |
May 7, 2012
Today, e-discovery law and practices are in a continuous state of flux, which underscores the need for corporations to continually evolve in order to meet their ever-changing ESI obligations.
-
By David Canfield |
April 24, 2012
As the corporate world becomes increasingly paperless, the preservation of electronically stored information (ESI) remains a necessity for organizations involved in litigation. Given that data spoliation sanctions can be immense, the automatic or unintentional deletion of ESI associated with information technology data management is one of the most significant risks...
-
By Gregory Schodde |
April 23, 2012
Even before defining an ESI problem, the first step in most models for ESI discovery is some kind of identification effort.
-
By Rob McFarlane, Russell Petersen |
April 13, 2012
Parties involved in complex litigation face increasing e-discovery costs in almost every case. These costs are particularly acute in patent actions.
-
By Steven Hunter |
April 10, 2012
There’s good news in the world of electronic discovery. This February in New York, Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck and counsel for the parties in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe gave us a magnificent e-discovery lesson and pushed open the door for the utilization of advanced search technologies.
-
By Alan Freeman, Paul M. Honigberg |
April 5, 2012
So much has been written about the duty to preserve electronic evidence that there is little room left for original scholarship. Simply stated, the duty arises when litigation is reasonably anticipated. Compliance can be shockingly expensive, yet counsel and litigants who fall short of the court’s expectations could pay a...
-
By Thomas Lidbury, Michael Boland |
March 30, 2012
The efficacy and defensibility of so-called “predictive coding” has been a hot topic in light of Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck stating the he “has approved of the use of computer-assisted review” in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe, and Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan conducting a still ongoing evidentiary hearing in...
-
By James Hanft |
March 30, 2012
A look at model orders in different jurisdictions
-
By Adam Cohen, Jonathan Nystrom |
March 27, 2012
The latest e-discovery opinion to cause a stir is from a federal magistrate judge well known in the field for his ability to communicate e-discovery “best practices” to practitioners. In Da Silva Moore, et al. v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck issued the first reported...
