InsideCounsel offers a wide range of free whitepapers, case studies and industry analysis provided by industry leaders. Please review our current Resource Center content that can help you today!
For information on posting content or content syndication in the Resource Center, please contact Tracey Zwolak.
Inside 1 Terabyte Per Hour: Building a high-performance pipeline for heterogeneous data processing in AWS.Read More
In February 2016, we announced that our data processing software Digital Discovery Pro had exceeded the processing rate of one terabyte per hour - which exceeded known performance by than 20x.
The development team worked closely with AWS architects to achieve this rate by exploiting the AWS platform to bring to bear the compute power necessary to achieve these rates and solve a significant pain point in the legal industry.
This technical paper provides an overview of the following:
- Market need for improved processing
- Phases of data processing for legal
- Challenges for improving processing speed
- Methodology for measuring processing performance
As we reflect on cases of 2015, we continue to see the courts analyzing them for spoliation with a high bar to determine if awarding sanctions is appropriate.Read More
The standards set forth in proposed changes to Rule 37(e) require that in order to impose an adverse inference, spoliation must have (i) caused substantial prejudice in the litigation and the result of willfulness or bad faith; or (ii) irreparably deprived a party of any meaningful opportunity to present or defend against the claims in the litigation.
Download to learn more about these most recent preservation cases:
- United States ex rel Guardiola v. Renown Health
- New Orleans Reg'l Physician Hosp. Org., Inc. v. United States
- Grove City Veterinary Serv., LLC, V. Charter Practices Int'l, LLC
- HM Elecs. v. R.F. Techs., Inc.
- NuVasive, Inc. v. Madsen Med., Inc.
- Burd v. Ford Motor Co.
The industry’s most extensive study of preservation practices finds processes still lack maturity.Read More
The Benchmark Survey is the industry's most extensive survey series focused on legal data preservation and collections practices. Building on the inaugural 2013 and 2014 studies, over 421 professionals dealing directly with litigation hold management participated.
The report has findings on the demographics, processes, common pain points and risks associated with legal holds, data preservation and data collection.
In a recent survey of 92 in-house legal staff about their data processing methods. We focused on three success factors: cost, time, and ease.Read More
The survey respondents consisted of legal professionals, including attorneys, litigation support managers, paralegals, and non-legal professionals such as IT and records managers, from in-house legal teams at organizations.
In this report, you will learn why:
- Process is still used the most
- Are the most common reasons for frustrations
- In-house teams are most satisfied by
- Kind of resources in-house teams are using
As a reaction to increasing demand for SaaS E-Discovery applications, there has been a proliferation of "fake SaaS" solutions.Read More
Prompted by the expanding volume, accelerating velocity, and multiplying variety of data, companies around the globe are launching Saas e-discovery initiatives and are embracing the cloud to reduce costs, improve scalability, and gain operational agility.
As a reaction to increasing demand for Saas E-Discovery applications, there has a proliferation of "fake Saas" solutions. This is when a software provider mounts a web portal onto a server hosting their on-premise software in an attempt to simulate cloud benefits.
Download this resource to learn how to identify true vs. fake SaaS.