Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Google wins attorney fees in patent troll battle

Google goes after patent troll, wins $1.3 million in attorneys’ fees

Patent trolls are thorns in the sides of most technology companies. Major players like Apple, Amazon, Samsung and Google can either pay the trolls or open their coffers to fight frivolous lawsuits. Either way, the troll problem drains precious resources from these businesses. So what is a tech giant to do when it’s bullied by a troll? 

The first step, perhaps, is to go on the offensive. That’s exactly what Google earlier this year, when it won a jury trial against non-practicing entity Beneficial Innovations (BI), which had sued dozens of media companies over patents for online ad technology.



The English Rule: Loser pays

Patent reform on Capitol Hill

Patent troll ordered to pay FindtheBest’s attorney’s fees after failed patent litigation case


Google’s lawyers saw this as a breach of contract, claiming the tech giant had already paid for a license and that BI was going after companies that were using Google’s Doubleclick service. In the end, Google was victorious in the suit, though theirs was a victory in name only, as it received only a single dollar in the settlement.

But Google was not satisfied with an award that would only allow it to buy a four-piece of Chicken McNuggets. Instead, it went for the proverbial jugular, seeking reimbursement for attorney’s fees. 

This practice, also known as fee shifting, was a hot topic on Capitol Hill, as many members of Congress – and many businesses – wanted it to be a key component of any new patent reform. While Congress did not pass any patent reform legislation this year, the practice of fee shifting was the focus of the recent Octane Fitness v. Icon HealthSupreme Court decision.

Now, U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap has awarded Google $1.3 million in attorney’s fees. That does not amount to much when considering the deep coffers of the tech giant, but it is a significant hit for BI as well as a signal that judges are now more likely to give these awards, which could act as a deterrent to future patent troll litigation.

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.