Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Update: Holmes estate must pay up

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s estate must pay back author who challenged Sherlock copyright

The latest plot twist in the “Case of the Convoluted Copyright,” is a bit, shall we say, elementary. A court has ruled that the estate of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle must pay Leslie Klinger, the author and editor who challenged the Sherlock Holmes copyright.

Earlier this year, the 7th Circuit ruled that the majority of Doyle’s Holmes stories are in the public domain and that companies and individuals that wish to publish stories about Holmes are free to do so without paying a licensing fee, at least in most circumstances.

The case was brought by Klinger, who had been publishing stories about the detective and had initially paid a licensing fee to the Doyle estate. But Klinger argued that he did not need to pay the fee since the majority of Holmes stories had passed into the public domain. The Doyle estate contended that the copyright should be extended because the latter Holmes stories contributed a great deal to the character and those were still protected by copyright. The 7th Circuit court did not buy the argument and found in favor of Klinger.



Roundup: Intellectual Property

Will the Supreme Court krackle for Kirby?

Supreme Court quashes Aereo but leaves room for innovation


Now the U.S. Court of Appeal has ruled that the Doyle estate must pay Klinger over $30,000 to reimburse “disreputable” fees that it had charged. Klinger has filed a separate motion for reimbursement of nearly $40,000 in attorney’s fees. 

The court ruled that the Doyle estate had essentially be extorting money from Klinger and lauded the writer and editor for standing up to a disreputable business practice, performing a “public service.” The court sees the reimbursement not as a reward but merely a chance for Klinger to break even, and it urged the Doyle estate to change its business model in the future.


Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.