Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Lloyds Banking Group fined $370 million for Libor manipulation

Fines imposed by multiple regulatory bodies in the U.S. and U.K.

While the London interbank offered rate benchmark or Libor, is not necessarily an easy concept to wrap one’s head around, one thing is clear: attempts to distort that rate for personal benefit will result in harsh fines from multiple regulatory bodies. Or at least that seems to be the message following today’s announcement that both U.S. and U.K. agencies will charge Lloyds Banking Group with $370 million in fines over allegations that it manipulated rates to put itself in a better position.

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have each accused the bank of multiple forms of manipulation. An FCA probe revealed that Lloyds attempted to rig the Libor rate for the U.S. dollar and also conspired with New York-based Rabobank to Influence Japanese yen rates; DOJ investigation also revealed multiple attempts at this type of manipulation.

Libor is a benchmark for the interest rates at which international banks lend to each other. The information is computed based on information provided by those banks, and when reported inaccurately, it can give an advantage or disadvantage to the amount of money made on that interest rate.

Related stories:

Barclays to open compliance academy in face of international fines and criticism

FHFA COO faces felony charges of threatening to shoot outgoing agency director

SEC staffer near deferred prosecution agreement in stock case


A Federal Bureau of Investigation probe not only found frequent cases of manipulation but a cavalier attitude relating to how they were conducted. For example, on July 28, 2006, the Rabobank submitter wrote to the Yen LIBOR submitter: “morning skipper.....will be setting an obscenely high 1m again today...poss 38 just fyi.”   The Yen LIBOR submitter responded: “(K)...oh poor customers....hehehe!! manual input libors again today then!!!!”   Both banks’ submissions on that same day moved up one basis point, from 0.37 to 0.38.

In a statement, DOJ Anti-Trust Division Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brent Snyder said,  “Lloyds manipulated benchmark rates, allowing its traders to increase their profits unfairly and fraudulently. Lloyds’s conduct undermined financial markets domestically and abroad, and today’s charges send a clear message that we will continue to bring those responsible to justice."

Lloyds is only the most recent bank to be reprimanded for what appears to have been a widespread practice from the mid-2000’s to 2011. Seven institutions have received similar penalties from U.S. and U.K regulators; Barclay’s, UBS, RBS and J.P. Morgan, were among the others involved.

Executive Editor

author image

Chris DiMarco

Chris DiMarco, Executive Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, has a background in multimedia production with previous involvement in projects in which he developed and created content...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.