Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


FCC prepares to release new net neutrality guidelines

Will allow deals for connection priority

Following the removal of open Internet provisions stemming from the Verizon v. Federal Communication Commission (FCC) decision in January, the FCC has repeatedly stated that it would work to keep the Internet equitable for traffic of all types. On April 23, the FCC announced that new a proposal to preserve the concept of net neutrality will be released on May 15. Sources say that while the plan will protect traffic from Internet service provider favoritism, it will also allow for companies to pay for faster connectivity.

The move is seen as an attempt by regulators to find common ground between consumers and service providers, and is likely to leave no party fully satisfied. While consumer advocates argue that the ability to pay for preferred service will inevitably lead to discrimination against those who do not pay, service providers say it will allow them to provide customers with new products.

Providers are also likely to be subject to much more stringent disclosure statements when they strike deals for service priority. While customers are not likely to see pricing increases immediately, the service fees paid by content producers could potentially make their way to consumer down the road.

Currently content providers a like Google pay to use infrastructure that brings their information to the doorsteps of service providers, and providers then deliver that data to customers. Wall Street Journal reports that one cable executive says that the last leg of that journey should not be regulated any differently.

“Somebody has to pay for this, and if they weren't going to let companies pay for enhanced transport and delivery…it just seemed like this was going to come back to the consumer."

WSJ  report that that  the American Civil Liberties Union takes the exact opposite opinion, saying, "If the FCC embraces this reported reversal in its stance toward net neutrality, barriers to innovation will rise, the marketplace of ideas on the Internet will be constrained, and consumers will ultimately pay the price."

We’ll bring you more when the plan has been released.


For more on net neutrality check out these stories:

FCC rules target broadcasters with multiple stakes in a single location

A new bidder emerges for wireless network provider LightSquared

Executive Editor

author image

Chris DiMarco

Chris DiMarco, Executive Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, has a background in multimedia production with previous involvement in projects in which he developed and created content...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.