Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Online media legal needs not that much different from other news outlets

A study conducted found that online media legal needs are quite similar in terms of advice and dispute as other offline publications

The advent and flourishing of online media has effectively stifled many a print publication, and its proliferation has changed the world of journalism in ways that are yet to be fully felt. But in one way, online media shares similar a specific gripe with any other news outlets: legal needs.

The Harvard Digital Media Law Project issued a report called “The Legal Needs of Emerging Online Media: The Online Media Legal Network After 500 Referrals,” which explores the relationship of those in the burgeoning and/or established-as-successful online media outlets to the legal field. The project maintains a group called the Online Media Legal Network (OMLN), which offers pro-bono legal services to independent journalists and digital publishers according to Capital New York.

In over 500 cases analyzed that were handled by the OMLN, the data showed that most clients — from both online and offline groups — required the same legal services including website terms of use drafting, mergers and acquisitions, corporate formation, and contract drafting.

The study's authors, Jeffrey Hermes and Andrew Sellars, were quoted by Capital New York: “There remains much that has not changed in the nature and needs of journalism as it flourishes online. Rather, what has changed is journalists’ monetary ability to obtain counsel for the sorts of issues that these ventures have always faced.”

Defamation is one of the most highly cited claims against media outfits, which can often result in massive fees and penalties. And, surprisingly, plagiarism is not quite as heavily in the spotlight as some would believe. The report distinctly mentions that the clients were providers of original content, and many were not necessarily even coming to OMLN for litigation, but rather business advice. There are a few areas of focus. The report notes: “OMLN clients show significant evidence of forward planning. They are more often proactive than reactive to legal issues, frequently seeking assistance with intellectual property, content liability, and corporate questions before crises occur.”

While online media is still in the throes of its heyday, that does not mean it has eluded the courtroom. Although as regulations amount in various countries over IP claims and other requirements for online media presences, perhaps the OMLN will see the legal needs of online media shift.


Further reading:

SEC not altering compliance rules for social media

Mitigating the media risks of public litigation 

The risks and rewards of social media

Contributing Author

author image

Juliana Kenny

Juliana Kenny is a contributor to, covering a range of topics including patent litigation, conflict mineral laws, executive compensation, and antitrust regulation. Juliana earned B.A.s...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.