Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Apple faces off against another patent troll over iMovie application

NPE Patent Harbor files infringement suit against Apple

As one of the largest and most profitable companies in the technology space, there is little surprise that Apple is such a popular target for non-practicing entities (NPEs) or, as they are sometimes known, patent trolls

Apple has faced a number of patent infringement suits from NPEs, so the latest should come as no surprise. This most recent case involves Patent Harbor LLC, an NPE that holds patents that relate to an “apparatus and method for assembling content addressable video.” The company filed a lawsuit stating that Apple’s iMovie application infringed on this patent. 

Patent Harbor claims that the iMovie software, which can be used on a number of devices, including the MacBook computers, and iMac devices, uses a method for creating and using tags to label, store and assemble video content that infringes on its patents. In its filing, Patent Harbor said that the “iMovie application allows a user of the computer to take pre-recorded video and create a title or chapter list (similar to the scene selection menu provided on a commercial DVD/BD disc), where the title or chapter menu has a description (pictorial or written) of the video that will be accessed if the viewing user selects a particular title or chapter from the scene selection menu.”

According to, Patent Harbor is a textbook example of a troll, as it exists as a company with only two employees and does not make any products, instead focusing on generating revenue through licensing or patent enforcement. Patent Harbor is seeking compensatory damages in the form of a reasonable royalty as well as future royalties. 

For more patent troll news, check out the following:


Newegg goes another round against patent trolls

Examining proposed legislation to reduce the discovery burden in patent cases

Go ask Alice: Supreme Court to hear arguments on software patents

Adam Carolla fights back against patent trolls


Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.