Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Facebook faces $80,000 personal injury litigation

Daughter’s Facebook post violates confidentiality provision, throwing out $80,000 settlement

A recent college girl’s Facebook post resulted in a court throwing out an $80,000 settlement, because the plaintiff and his daughter breached the terms of a confidential agreement when the she bragged about it on Facebook.

Only a few days after the case settled, the plaintiff’s daughter posted to 1,200 Facebook friends that her parents “won the case...Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”

The Legal Examiner reported that the Court of Appeal of Florida concluded that the defendant did not have to pay the $80,000 settlement on the ground that the daughter’s post violated the confidentiality provision in the agreement, and showed that the plaintiff himself had violated it by telling his daughter.

These days, privacy settings on Facebook and other social networks do not mean that your posts are confidential. In fact, in McMillen v. Hummingbird Speedway, Inc., the plaintiff, Bill R. McMillen, Sr., sought damages for injuries sustained when he was rear-ended during a cool down lap following a stock car race. When accessing the public portion of his Facebook page, the defendants discovered posts that allegedly showed that McMillen had exaggerated his injuries.

The defendants then requested access to McMillen’s Facebook and MySpace user names and passwords, contending that private areas could contain evidence relevant to his damages claim, specifically, whether he had made comments which contradicted his disability and damages claims. In ordering McMillen to provide such access, the judge concluded that “no person choosing MySpace or Facebook as a communications forum could expect that his communications would remain confidential, as both sites clearly express the possibility of disclosure.”


For more on social media, check out these articles: 

How Smarsh helps advisers, broker-dealers adapt to social media compliance

Technology: How to link employer work rules and social media policies

The developing complexities of social media in the workplace

Facebook still faces foes to privacy settlement

Contributing Author

author image

Amanda Ciccatelli

Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation, and more. She earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.