Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by Law.com, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!

X

SEC staffer near deferred prosecution agreement in stock case

Deferred prosecution agreements are often approved for major corporations but rarely individuals

Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) aren’t only for businesses, as U.S. prosecutors have entered into a DPA with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staffer accused of unlawfully holding stocks and lying about his portfolio in court.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s office announced in a late February court filing that it has reached a potential DPA with SEC staffer Steven Gilchrist pending a probation office investigation. The court filing did not give any indication of the nature of the DPA, other than to request a delay in proceedings.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the New York-based Gilchrist was charged with three counts of making false statements regarding his financial holdings. He claimed that all of his stock holdings were in alignment with the SEC’s employee rules, but in actuality, he held shares of six companies that SEC staffers are barred from holding.

Deferred prosecution agreements are often approved for major corporations — such as HBSC’s agreement with the U.S. government last August — but rarely are DPAs approved for individuals.

DPAs also carry with them some risk if in-house counsel are not careful. As Valecia McDowell, John Fagg, and Kimberly Cochran wrote in a June 2012 InsideCounsel column, some parties that enter into the agreements “find themselves forced to waive the attorney-client privilege, restructure their business, turn over work attorney product, pay hefty fines and carry out an array of other stipulations required by the prosecutor or enforcement division of a regulating agency.”

The authors also wrote that the public perception of DPAs offering a financial benefit is misconceived. Even after entering a DPA, many parties still have paid fines of hundreds of millions of dollars related to misconduct.

 

For more on white collar defense, check out these recent articles:

Supreme Court Gabelli decision will continue to bring changes to SEC enforcement policy

Beanie Babies billionaire secretly withheld bank records from grand jury

Former Madoff aide testifies in own trial

Former Barclays traders face criminal charges for Libor manipulation

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.