Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Battlefield 4 class action suit never fires first shot

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd never appointed a lead plaintiff in the case

This is sure to increase the Electronic Arts (EA) legal team’s gamer score: An attempted class action lawsuit against the company for problems surrounding the release of Battlefield 4 has stalled before it could ever get off the ground.

In December, securities law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP filed a complaint in U.S. district court that claimed EA willfully misled purchasers into buying the game despite knowing that it had multiple issues upon release. The game launched on Oct. 29 with a number of bugs, and the game’s servers were hit with a DDOS attack in November that hampered customers’ ability to play even further.

But now, Gamespot reports that all mention of the lawsuit has been scrubbed from the law firm’s website. In addition, the firm has not responded to any request for comment from the gaming website, whether through voicemail or email.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd had 60 days after the initial complaint for a lead plaintiff to come forward in order for the case to proceed as a class action lawsuit. However, it seems that lead plaintiff never actually materialized. As such, the case is now functionally dead.

At the time of the initial complaint, EA told Gamespot that the accusations were “meritless” and that “We intend to aggressively defend ourselves, and we're confident the court will dismiss the complaint in due course.”

The attempted class action lawsuit claimed that EA CEO Peter Moore had willfully misled customers by claiming in a July 23, 2013, conference call that “[w]e couldn't be happier with the quality of the games our teams are producing or the early reception those games are getting from critics and consumers.” The suit had planned to include plaintiffs who had purchased EA stock between the following day, July 24, and Dec. 4, 2013.

In January, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann and Bernstein also announced a similar proposed class action lawsuit against EA. The law firm’s website claims that it accepted applications for lead plaintiff until Feb. 18, 2014, but there is no word whether the move was successful.


For more on securities litigation, check out these InsideCounsel articles:

SCOTUS will allow fraud victims to sue all entities involved with Stanford Ponzi scheme

Wells Fargo decreases expected litigation expenses by $50 million

Morgan Stanley could pay $275 million financial crisis settlement to SEC

Western Union under investigation for possible connection to fraud

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.