Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


How has the AIA affected small businesses?

With the one-year anniversary of the first-to-file provision looming, has the law hurt small companies?

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was signed into law in September of 2011, but many of its central provisions did not go into effect until Mar. 16, 2013. This means that we are fast approaching the one-year anniversary of many of the new policies and procedures that it brought forth, including the “first to file” provision. The question looms, then, did this change to the law help or hurt inventors?

Prior to the AIA, the U.S. had a “first to invent” system of granting patents rewarded the inventor who could demonstrate that he or she had invented the technology first. This change to “first inventor to file” puts the U.S. in line with other nations, but some experts say that the new provisions have placed undue strain on small businesses.

In the old system, inventors could publicly disclose an invention and be afforded a 12-month grace period that would allow them to tinker with and improve the technology before they needed to apply for patent protection. Now, however, companies feel the pressure to file as early as possible, and that process is expensive. In the past, companies could use that 12-month period to raise capital, but now they feel the need to file as soon as possible, often ending up filing for patents on technology that turns out to be a dead end.

Of course, patent reform is still a big topic in Washington, as Congress continues to debate bills that would once again change the way the system works. Topics include fee shifting, increased transparency and more, but the fact of the matter is, the first-to-file provision will remain intact. Companies need to take other measures, such as conducting extensive research and hiring the right patent attorney.


For related stories, check out the following:

IP: Do the new patent office trials really make patent litigation cheaper?

IP: Understanding and tracking your IP assets

The case for design patents in manufacturing and industrial technologies

IP: These claims are not obvious, just ask my expert!

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.