Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


5th Circuit upholds BP oil spill settlement

The appeals court said a district court judge correctly found that the plaintiffs in the class action case had been damaged by the oil spill

Score one for the Gulf: The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a lower court’s decision approving a multimillion dollar settlement with BP stemming from the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

On Jan. 10, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled (PDF) that BP’s claims that the U.S. Constitution prohibits paying a settlement to those that have not suffered an injury, or cannot prove their injuries were caused by the spill, were without merit. Instead, the appeals court said, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier correctly found that the plaintiffs in the class action case had been damaged by the oil spill.

In a majority opinion, Judge W. Eugene Davis, who was joined by Judge James Dennis, said that the settlement agreement required those looking to be paid “meet the descriptions of one or more” of several damage categories laid out within the agreement. The judges found that the plaintiffs met those descriptions.

The 5th Circuit had previously halted some payments to the victims of the oil spill over allegations that Barbier had improperly approved rules set forth by Court Appointed Claims Administrator Patrick Juneau that had given an improper damages total. However, the 5th Circuit said that these discrepancies were not enough to overturn the agreement itself.

 “Today's ruling is an enormous victory for the Gulf, and an important step forward in ensuring that every eligible claimant is fully compensated according to the objective, transparent formulas spelled out in the settlement agreement that BP co-authored and agreed to,” said attorneys Stephen Herman and Jim Roy, head of the committee that sued BP, in a statement to The Times-Picayune.

In his dissenting opinion, however, Judge Emilio Garza said that the majority opinion should not have ignored the Constitution’s requirement that claims be linked to causation. Garza wrote that “whether a class member was economically injured is immaterial if that loss was not caused by the oil spill” and that Administrator Juneau’s interpretation of the law eliminated “all causation requirements for a broad swath of the class.”


InsideCounsel has been on top of the ongoing BP oil spill case from the beginning. The most recent updates:

5th Circuit halts some BP oil spill payments

BP faces second leg of civil trial

Claims administrator says BP’s budget qualms an attempt to stall repayment

Texas sues BP over Gulf oil spill

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.