Technology: 5 reasons privacy isn’t as bad as you think

Five reasons why those asking for privacy advice shouldn't leave panicked and confused

One of the frustrations of being a lawyer is the imperative to recommend the least-risky course of action, even knowing that our clients’ success often requires taking risks. This imperative arises because the lawyer who advises the most thorough (and expensive) approach is beyond reproach when things go bad, whereas the lawyer who tries to give more practical guidance may not be. Being a naysayer becomes the safest bet.

This is especially true in the context of privacy and data security. The requirements imposed by various jurisdictions can be Byzantine. The consequences of shortchanging privacy and data security can be serious. As a result, lawyers rarely (if ever) advise their clients that less-than-perfect measures may be “good enough.” In-house counsel who turn to specialized privacy practitioners for guidance are far more likely to be told that they need to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars improving their privacy practices than that what they’re doing is probably good enough. I’ve given such advice myself. What may be lacking in such recommendations, though, is enough background and context to enable useful cost/benefit analysis. Clients may end up overwhelmed, panicked or confused.

Contributing Author

author image

Kit Winter

Kit Winter is a member at law firm Dykema Gossett in Los Angeles and focuses on internet, intellectual property and business litigation. He can be...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.