Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


The future of software patents, part 1

Supreme Court to help shape the software industry

The software industry is at a crossroads. The issue of whether or not software can be patented has reached the Supreme Court, and the Court’s decision will have wide-ranging ramifications across the technology sector. 

What makes this issue so important? How are technology patents different from other types of patents? And what does the future hold?

I asked these questions and more to Greg Winsky, of counsel at Archer & Greiner. Winsky has a great deal of experience in this area, having been general counsel for the Franklin Computer Corporation in the 1980s. It was involved in one of the first IP cases with Apple, showing that operating system programs can be copyrighted. There were patents involved in the case as well, patents that were tied to hardware such as monitors.

Winsky said that the first issue is that there has been no clear guidance on how to determine whether or not a software-based invention meets the test of Section 101 of the Patent Act, whether an invention is actually patentable. The Federal Circuit has been divided on this, and now the Supreme Court can offer clarity as to how the determination should be made.

The Supreme Court, of course, does not generally take a lot of patent cases. It has made some recent rulings, including the Bilski case, which addressed business methods, and the Prometheus case, which dealt with subject matter patentability. In the current case, Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International,  there are three patents in question, two of which are process or method patents and the third of which is a system patent.

In the second part of this series, we’ll discuss a bit more about how software patents are different from other types, the role of copyright, and what impact this ruling could have on large companies.


In the meantime, check out the following stories:

AIPLA taps Lex Machina for legal analytics

Apple, Samsung patent cases offer big payout for IP lawyers

Supreme Court to rule on software patent protection

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.