Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

L.A. files against banks for discriminatory lending

Three major U.S. banks have come under fire for lending practices that allegedly resulted in 200,000 foreclosures

Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup are the three latest banks against which the California city of Los Angeles has filed mortgage-lending discrimination suits. The prosecution alleges that discriminatory practices against minorities and dubious lending practices have been in effect since 2004, and has led to steep costs for the city.

The city's goal is reportedly to try to recover tax revenue lost as a result of a wave of foreclosures — approximately 200,000 — that led to a loss of $78 billion in home values. While housing foreclosures can be the result of a wide array of market forces, the city claims that the aforementioned three banks committed predatory lending and engaged minority communities in loans they could not afford resulting in housing losses and increased need for city services.

On December 5, Los Angeles city attorney Mike Feuer said that the banks "engaged in a continuous pattern and practice of mortgage discrimination in Los Angeles since at least 2004 by imposing different terms or conditions on a discriminatory and legally prohibited basis."

The consequential dwindling of the city's property tax base have caused a property tax loss of $481 million, among other raised city service costs including affordable housing, safety services, and property maintenance.

All three banks have come forward with statements defending their actions and declaring Feuer's words to be in error.


Further reading:

FHFA seeking $6 billion from Bank of America in mortgage crisis settlement

Former Countrywide exec faces mortgage fraud allegations

JPMorgan pays $18.3 million to settle mortgage suit

Contributing Author

author image

Juliana Kenny

Juliana Kenny is a contributor to, covering a range of topics including patent litigation, conflict mineral laws, executive compensation, and antitrust regulation. Juliana earned B.A.s...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.