Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by Law.com, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!

X

More On

Former Optionable CEO files to dismiss BMO suit permanently

BMO had already filed to dismiss the suit, but with the option to refile in the future

Kevin Cassidy, the former CEO of commodities brokerage Optionable Inc., pled guilty to criminal charges in 2012 for helping the Bank of Montreal (BMO) conceal as much as C$853 million ($803 million) in commodity trading losses. But is the bank’s four-year old civil suit against Cassidy malicious in nature?

Cassidy believes so, and he has filed to have BMO’s suit dropped permanently in a Manhattan court filing. Cassidy calls the suit malicious because it intended to shift blame away from the bank’s own problems. BMO had already asked the court to drop the case without prejudice, meaning the bank could refile the suit down the road.

In his filing, Cassidy called BMO’s petition to drop the suit “patently absurd.” According to Cassidy, neither the Department of Justice nor the bank have been able to show that Cassidy directly caused any losses for the bank. Cassidy also claims that the bank ignored Optionable’s advice, electing to not change its trading system following a previous $51 million natural gas trading loss in 2001.

BMO announced in April 2007 that the company held C$680 million of pretax commodity-trading losses. Those later losses grew to C$853 million for the fiscal year.

Cassidy’s filing also says that BMO ignored a magistrate judge’s advice in January that the bank should have lawyers ready to answer questions from Cassidy and his legal team. Instead, according to Bloomberg, BMO “chose to fold its tent and go home.”

BMO has not publicly commented on Cassidy’s most recent filing. In its own Nov. 20 filing to have the case dropped without prejudice, however, the bank wrote that the case should be dropped because Cassidy does not have the $8.6 million that BMO seeks in restitution. “Any jury verdict against him in this civil litigation would offer BMO no economic benefit,” the filing said.

According to BMO, the bank has already reached preliminary settlements with a number of other defendants in the case, including Optionable and MF Global Holdings Ltd.’s bankruptcy estate.

 

For more banking litigation, check out these InsideCounsel stories:

Wells Fargo executive added to government ‘reckless’ spending lawsuit

Post $13B-settlement, JPMorgan’s GC questions big bank fines

DOJ investigation reveals JPMorgan ignored red flags as early as 2006

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.