Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Emergency responders: Cell phone tracking not precise enough

Argues that with a more mobile population the need for better tracking is paramount

For a population increasingly concerned about personal information being collected and transmitted, the idea of cellphone location tracking seems like another reason to bemoan the nanny state. But while many may not like it, the ability to track cellphone locations more precisely could save lives.

Emergency responders say that better tracking technology would make it easier to locate and respond to incidents. However, carriers say that the technology currently available should be sufficient to find the cellphone making a call.

Though the proliferation of cellphones has allowed people to report emergencies more quickly and frequently, the lack of solid location tracking technology in cellphones can make it more difficult to find the person making the call. The swing in the cellular direction has caused many response teams to ask first where the caller is rather than the nature of the emergency.

According to the Wall Street Journal, around 38 percent of households no longer use landlines, preferring cellphones as the communication method of choice. This switch is more pronounced in certain areas; in California, for example, 75 percent of the emergency calls made in the last 18-months were made on cellphones.

While older cellphones were less accurate in providing a location, they were able to transmit that information immediately. New cellphones, on the other hand, can give dispatchers a better idea of location but transmit the info in two stages: first showing which cell tower is being used to relay the call, and then updating with GPS information. This can take up to 30 seconds, and does not work as well when transmitting information from indoors.

With the so called “Snowden-effect” still in full force, and a public wary about where their information goes, it’s unknown whether more precise cellphone tracking systems will be appalled or applauded by consumers. Emergency teams say that regardless of public opinion; it will save lives.

Check out these additional InsideCounsel stories on privacy:

Cloudy skies for US-based hosting companies ahead of PRISM scandal

Congressman asks to bar NSA’s “back doors” to encryption

Facebook and Yahoo ask court to allow them to publish data

Executive Editor

author image

Chris DiMarco

Chris DiMarco, Executive Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, has a background in multimedia production with previous involvement in projects in which he developed and created content...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.