Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Apple seeks to bar Samsung devices yet again

Apple wants to stop Samsung from selling devices that infringe on its patents

The Apple vs. Samsung drama continues to heat up, as the maker of the iPad and iPhone gains another opportunity to argue that Samsung should not be allowed to sell mobile devices that infringe on Apple patents.

This new chance is the result of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which ruled that a U.S. District Court Judge, Lucy Koh, made a mistake when she denied Apple’s request for an injunction against several Samsung products. In essence, Judge Koh did not consider all of the evidence in the matter, and did not give Apple a sufficient chance to prove that it was harmed by Samsung’s patent infringement.

At the heart of this matter are a series of patents that relate to Apple’s iPhone devices. Apple contends that it spent billions of dollars to develop the technology, and that Samsung should be banned from selling devices that infringe on the patents in question. Samsung has stopped selling most of the devices already, but Apple feels that the injunction will prevent further infringement in the future. Samsung, on the other hand, feels that monetary compensation would be sufficient.

Judge Koh must once again consider whether an injunction is warranted, this time giving more weight to whether or not consumers are willing to pay more for the Samsung devices that use the patented touchscreen technology. This question runs parallel to the pending decision on how much Samsung must pay Apple as a result of these infringements.


For more on the patent war in the hi-tech space, check out the articles below:

Google wins copyright suit thanks to Google Books’ public benefit

IBM adds new patent to vast portfolio

Apple seeks to recoup cut damages from Samsung patent infringement

Massachusetts Attorney General latest to take on patent trolls

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.