Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

LightSquared sues GPS makers

Claims several major GPS manufacturers suppressed information that directly resulted in its collapse

The advent of more accessible wireless Internet connectivity has been a boon for consumers in the far-flung corners of the world. But according to a suit filed by LightSquared on Nov. 1, its development of 4G LTE services was not in the best interest of global positioning system manufacturers, who LightSquared argues made a concerted effort to block the company’s successful deployment of wireless networks that would bring connectivity to underserved areas.

In the complaint, LightSquared claims that several GPS manufacturers as well as industry groups undermined its investment in the development of network architecture by conspiring to suppress information that the network it was building could be disruptive to GPS networks. Because of issues with interference, LightSquared was unable to obtain certification for the 4G LTE networks with the Federal Communications Commission, and ultimately had its license to use the wireless spectrum revoked.

The plaintiff claims that this information was intentionally released after it had poured billions into infrastructure and technology for its services, and directly resulted in its bankruptcy. In the filing LightSquared said, “The Defendants engaged in a calculated effort to block the deployment of a new wireless broadband network that would serve millions of underserved consumers at lower prices while increasing competition and innovation in the wireless industry.”

A similar suit was filed by LightSquared’s parent company, Harbinger Capital Partners, in August. This suit sought $1.9 billion dollars in damages, claiming that it had worked with GPS makers to mitigate the interference issues for devices using its network, but ultimately being thrown under the federal regulation bus by these same companies. While there are slight differences between the two suits, they are both based on concerns that these manufacturers hid information crucial to the future of the LightSquared network.

Currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, LightSquared has been auctioning off assets in an attempt to recoup the money it invested in the development of its network project. While the company is expected to make billions of dollars selling these assets, it claims that it would be more profitable had it been able to maintain certification for the use of wireless spectrum.


Check out InsideCounsel’s coverage of other bankruptcy and technology stories here:

Atari wins approval to overcome bankruptcy

Dish director quits after disagreement over handling of LightSquared deal

Protecting “End Users” from patent infringement actions



Executive Editor

author image

Chris DiMarco

Chris DiMarco, Executive Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, has a background in multimedia production with previous involvement in projects in which he developed and created content...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.