Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Diebold Inc. to pay $48 million for FCPA violations

According to the SEC, “A bribe is a bribe, whether it’s a stack of cash or an all-expense-paid trip to Europe.”

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) isn’t just for technology companies —manufacturers can run afoul of the law as well. Automated teller machine (ATM) manufacturer Diebold Inc. has learned this lesson the hard way and now faces a $48 million settlement after foreign bribery charges.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) claims that Diebold attempted to bribe officials from China, Indonesia and Russia in exchange for government contracts on ATMs. The government estimates that Diebold spent $1.8 million on travel for foreign dignitaries and an additional $1.2 million in bribes to Russian officials to falsify books and records. In one instance, the SEC says, Diebold allegedly paid for Chinese bank officials to take a two-week trip around Europe, including stops in Paris and Rome.

Through the terms of the agreement, Diebold will enter a three-year deferred prosecution agreement and retain a compliance monitor for at least 18 months. If the company abides by the terms of the agreement for all three years, then charges will be dropped.

“A bribe is a bribe, whether it’s a stack of cash or an all-expense-paid trip to Europe,” said Scott W. Friestad, an associate director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, in a press release.  “Public companies must be held accountable when they break the law to influence government officials with improper payments or gifts.”

According to The New York Times, Diebold is simply happy to have the investigation behind them and is looking forward. “It’s imperative for Diebold to recognize these issues head on, acknowledge responsibility, put the FCPA investigation period behind it and get on with the business of managing the company,” a Diebold spokesman said. In its filing, the Justice Department acknowledged Diebold’s own company compliance as a reason for a potentially more lenient penalty.


For more stories of companies running afoul of the FCPA, read these InsideCounsel articles:

11th Circuit primed to issue key FCPA ruling

Mistakes and realities of implementing and executing effective compliance programs HP bribery probe expands to Poland

Labor: Anti-bribery crackdown is a wake-up call for U.S. companies in China

DOJ and SEC extend Microsoft’s bribe investigation

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.