Regulatory: Understanding discovery in administrative post-grant proceedings at the Patent & Trademark Office

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has adhered carefully to its charge that discovery be limited.

Litigating the validity of patent claims can be very costly in terms of time and money. The various post-grant patent challenge mechanisms introduced at the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) through the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) have promised an efficient administrative alternative to high-cost district court litigation. In a series of decisions over the past year, the PTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has offered guidance that can better inform decision makers as to both whether to pursue PTO post-grant proceedings and what discovery to expect. In considering and limiting the scope of discovery available, the Board has stressed, both in its orders and in telephonic hearings, the role of these new proceedings as an efficient alternative to District Court litigation — and one that must be completed within the one-year (or, if extended, 18-month) period mandated by statute.

Routine discovery

Contributing Author

author image

J. Steven Baughman

J. Steven Baughman is an intellectual property litigation partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Ropes & Gray LLP and highly regarded as a leading...

Bio and more articles

Contributing Author

author image

Paul M. Schoenhard

Paul M. Schoenhard is an IP litigation counsel in the Washington, D.C., office of Ropes & Gray LLP and an Adjunct Associate Professor at the...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.