Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Self-regulation duties fall on the board

As U.S. enforcement agencies crack down on crime, boards must take the lead in self-regulation

Harry Truman once famously stated “the buck stops here,” meaning that, as the President, he held ultimate responsibility for certain decisions. While buck passing might be common practice in middle management, when it comes to major issues, such as regulation and compliance, it is essential that those in power, especially the board, take responsibility for making sure everything is done correctly.

As U.S. enforcement agencies continue to get tough with corporate misconduct, companies are expected to police themselves. This provides an opportunity for these companies to discover problems on their own and deal with them, but it also means that, if they mishandle a situation, the consequences could be even larger.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice wants boards of directors to lead internal investigations to ensure that management does not interfere.

“Internal investigations these days are effectively an extension of government investigations,” Joe Whitley, a former acting associate attorney general and now a partner at Greenberg Traurig LLP, told the Journal. “A growing number of investigations are handled by the board once the government is involved.”

The board should spearhead investigations under many circumstances, but especially when there is suspicion of misconduct by members of senior management. While the DOJ will rarely demand the involvement of the board, it may look askance at an investigation that is conducted by senior management when members of that group are implicated.

It is a tricky situation for boards, as an independent investigation can be costly, time consuming and distracting, but the fact of the matter is, conducting such an investigation can go a long way toward proving to the DOJ that the company is doing everything in its power to get things right. After all, the board has a responsibility to demonstrate that the buck stops there. 

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.