Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by Law.com, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!

X

BlackBerry faces allegations of illegally inflated stock price

Investor Martin Perlman has filed a proposed class action suit in U.S. federal court

Fresh off a complicated sale to Canadian investors and a falling stock price, cell phone manufacturer BlackBerry Ltd. is facing some trouble once again. This time, though, it’s not to untangle the web of regulatory actions or revamp its financial strategy. It’s to fight off litigation from an investor who claims the company purposefully made false and misleading statements about its prospects.

Investor Martin Perlman filed a proposed class action lawsuit in U.S. federal court on Oct. 3, claiming BlackBerry CEO Thorsten Heins and CFO Brian Bidulka schemed to deliberately deceive investors concerning the company’s health and potential sales of the company’s BlackBerry 10 line of phones.

BlackBerry has seen a declining share in smartphone market over the past couple years, while Apple and Samsung have taken the lead. In a Sept. 27, 2012, press release the company said that the BlackBerry 10 would “drive improvements across the company.” According to Bloomberg, the suit claims Heins furthered that message on a conference call later that day, saying, BlackBerry “continues to be a financially strong company and we’re executing and delivering on our commitments.”

Perlman believes these actions were misleading to investors, since at the time Blackberry was in shambles. “In reality, the BlackBerry 10 was not well received by the market,” Perlman wrote in the complaint, “and the company was forced to write down a nearly $1 billion charge related to unsold BlackBerry 10 devices and lay off approximately 4,500 employees, totaling approximately 40 percent of its total workforce.”

Perlman says that the company’s statements illegally bolstered the price of the company’s stock, according to Bloomberg. Once the company’s phone write-offs and employees layoffs were revealed on Sept. 20, the company’s stock fell by 16 percent. The suit hopes to recoup damages for those shareholders who suffered because of the falling stock price between Sept. 27, 2012, and Sept. 20, 2013.

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.