Litigation: Basics of MDL formation, unpredictability and the JPML

Understanding the mechanics of the JPML is key to understanding whether your case is appropriate for multi-district litigation

For those unfamiliar with the procedure for creation of multi-district litigation (MDL), the process can seem daunting and unpredictable. For example, you may be in the beginning stages of litigating a few manageable consumer products-related cases in federal court. Before you even file a responsive pleading, however, the plaintiffs raise the stakes and seek to create an MDL, consolidating your cases with several other actions in different jurisdictions against competing manufacturers. Such a scenario forces you to field questions regarding the probability of consolidation and whether you have a real opportunity to oppose the MDL.

The answers to these questions rest largely on the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), which was created by Congress in 1968 under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to determine the appropriateness of, and location for, an MDL. The law allows for transfer of one or more actions that have “one or more common questions of fact” and upon the JPML’s “determination that transfers for such proceedings will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will promote the just and efficient conduct of such actions.”

Contributing Author

author image

Eric Fish

Eric Fish is a partner in BakerHostetler’s New York office. Eric focuses his practice on complex litigation, including product liability, class action, and commercial litigation...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.