Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Bank commodities stockpiling brings scrutiny from Commodity Futures Trading Commissions

CFTC’s Bart Chilton voices concerns on commodities trading

With vast networks of wealth between them and an ability to hold, acquire and store physical commodities on an almost infinite scale, it’s incredibly difficult to tease apart what the largest banks in the world actually physically own. This makes it nearly impossible to determine what kind of effect the stockpiling has on markets dependent on the relative supply of physical assets.

While regulatory bodies can see what banks like J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley are trading in the markets, it’s considerably more difficult to assess what they own in the way of physical assets and properties. But the bank-owned commodities are receiving increased focus, in part due to Commodity Futures Trading Commissions (CFTC) investigations on the effect they’re having in the commodities markets.

In a planned address Saturday before the Michigan Agri-Business Association, CFTC member Bart Chilton called for more complete disclosure on the material holdings of banks. Chilton asserted that because banks had nearly infinite wealth and the ability to hold commodities, there was a risk they could alter the fair trade of those physical holdings.

“Of course the prices of commodities are supposed to be based upon supply and demand. However what if you control, or have significant influence upon, the supply or the demand? Seems like perhaps—I don’t know—maybe there’s a conflict of interest,” Chilton said in his prepared remarks.

In August the CFTC began an investigation on banks inflating the cost of aluminum and other metals, issuing subpoenas to several large scale banks. The investigation was antagonized by complaints filed by beer and soda manufacturers who asserted that stockpiling of aluminum was making the metal more expensive.

Chilton said, “Congress should not only do away with the statutory exemption that has been used by Goldman and Morgan, but also do away with the ability of the Fed to allow any commodity-related ownership by the banks whatsoever.”

Banks should expect increased interest in their commodities activity, spurred in large part to CFTC investigations.

Executive Editor

author image

Chris DiMarco

Chris DiMarco, Executive Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, has a background in multimedia production with previous involvement in projects in which he developed and created content...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.