Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Supreme Court set to decide major labor cases

Affirmative action, disparate-impact and whistleblower protections all on the docket

Judicial watchdogs have about one month to wait until the Supreme Court opens its doors for arguments on Oct. 7. However, that has not kept people from examining the cases the Court will hear, and some key labor-related rulings should shape policy moving forward.

One of the first cases to watch will be Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, with arguments currently scheduled for Oct. 15. After the Court upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s affirmative-action plan ten years ago, affirmative-action opponents launched a campaign to pass a Michigan state amendment banning racial preferences at public employers and universities. The amendment passed in 2009, but the 6th Circuit then struck it down in a 2011 divided decision.

Watchers such as Daniel Fisher of Forbes believe the conservative majority of the court is likely to reverse the 6th Circuit and follow the minority opinion of 6th Circuit Judge Jeffery Sutton, who said, “A first premise for resolving this case is, and must be, that a State does not deny equal treatment by mandating it.” This comes after the Court remanded a similar case in Fisher v. Texas earlier this year.

However, that’s not the only key labor-specific case to watch for Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action will allow the Court to rule on whether the Obama administration’s use of statistics-based disparate-impact theories to prove racial discrimination holds up against the law. If the city of Mt. Holly, N.J., wins against the disparate-impact theories, then Fisher says racial discrimination claims against businesses will be tougher to prove.

Lawson v. FMR should also have a major impact in the workplace, this time with whistleblower protection at stake. The Court earlier this year expanded whistleblower protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to include more than just protections related to shareholder fraud. However, Lawson will provide a ruling of whether SOX protections also extend to employees of contractors and subcontractors as well. Fidelity (FMR) claims SOX was never intended to stretch that far, while an administrative court ruled that whistleblower protection held for all.

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.