Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Apple says DOJ’s e-book penalties put it at a disadvantage

Software giant claims Justice Department favors Amazon in it penalties

It’s the second time the Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken a stab at penalizing Apple Inc. for its e-book misdeeds, but the software giant is still crying foul.

After the DOJ won an antitrust lawsuit against Apple over its e-book sales in July, the agency filed a reform proposal that included a 10-year injunction, an internal antitrust monitor to oversee Apple’s e-book sales practices and a requirement allowing other e-book retailers, such as Amazon, to link to their e-book stores from iOS apps.

Apple immediately expressed concern that the proposal was vague, overreaching and unwarranted, and asked Judge Denise Cote, who has been handling the ongoing litigation, to have the DOJ try again. Cote sent both parties away to find common ground and report back to her.

When the DOJ came back earlier this week with what Apple views as a weakly revised set of penalties – cutting the injunction time and easing up on the requirement for rivals to link to e-book stores in iOS apps – Apple lawyer Orin Snyder filed a letter with the court.

Snyder said the DOJ’s revised remedies are a “broadside masquerading as a brief” and ignored Cote’s instructions to find common ground. Snyder asked Cote to order the DOJ to withdraw its latest proposal and instead, do what the court had asked it to do.

Yesterday, Cote asked both side to meet and produce and injunction she can sign next week.

Read more about this story on CNET.


Read more InsideCounsel coverage of the e-book suits:

DOJ says Apple spearheaded e-book price-fixing scheme

MacMillan settles e-book class actions

DOJ and Penguin reach settlement in e-books suit

Apple and e-book publishers offer proposed settlement with EU

Chinese writers win copyright battle against search engine Baidu

Romance novel authors sue over royalties

Barnes & Noble objects to e-book settlement

Apple takes on suits over e-books and Siri

Apple rejects DOJ charge of e-book price collusion

Authors sue Google over book digitization project

Google in talks with authors, publishers

Google gets two months to finalize Google Books

Google loses book case


Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.