Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Do patents spur innovation?

A new research initiative funded by Qualcomm will investigate the role that patents play in spurring innovation.

The term “patent troll” is certainly a controversial one. Some see patent aggregators as bottom feeders who wish to make a profit not through innovation, but through litigation. Others feel that patents are essential for both big business and small entrepreneurs, allowing them to protect their own ideas and spur on innovation.

With such a hot button topic dominating much of the intellectual property conversation these days, it was only a matter of time before companies felt the need to launch a study to look into the effect that patents have on innovation. Qualcomm Inc. has invested $2 million to fund a study on this very topic, to be conducted by the Searle Center at the Northwestern University School of Law.

The wireless company has tasked the minds at Searle to develop a series of databases to gather information about standards, licensing litigation and markets for patents. This data will help researchers determine how innovation occurs, how it is monetized, and how to spur on more creativity in the future.

“Critics claim that patents may, in some cases, limit technological advancement,” said Matthew Spitzer, director of the Searle Center, in a statement. “There is a lot of discussion about ‘patent thickets,’ ‘hold-up’ and ‘royalty stacking’ and how these constructs could hinder innovation, but there is surprisingly little actual data out there. Our project will create the needed data sets and allow the critics’ claims to be tested.”

In the end, this study should help draw the line between the actual trolls who wish to game the system for a quick buck, and the companies with genuine innovative purposes that are just looking to protect their own interests and grow in new and creative directions.

Senior Editor and Community Manager

author image

Rich Steeves

Richard P. Steeves is Senior Editor and Community Manager of InsideCounsel magazine, where he covers the intellectual property and compliance beats. Rich earned a B.A....

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.