Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


7th Circuit dismisses Scottie Pippen suit

Former NBA star sued media outlets for defamation

Ex-National Basketball Association (NBA) star Scottie Pippen just lost big time.

First, some background: In December 2011, the former Chicago Bulls player sued 10 media outlets, claiming they falsely reported that he had filed for bankruptcy. Pippen’s suit targeted CBS Corp., CNBC owners Comcast Corp. and General Electric Co., as well as other media companies for negligence, false light and defamation. He sought $10 million in damages. 

A district court dismissed Pippen’s case, and last week, the 7th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the suit. The court said Pippen failed to prove that the media outlets “either knew the statements [about his finances] to be false or were recklessly indifferent to whether they were true or false."

The 7th Circuit’s decision is also noteworthy because it addresses whether online media outlets have a duty to correct false statements they published. Pippen argued that because the defendants were online publishers, they could have easily altered the false stories, and because they didn’t, they should face consequences.

An Illinois statute pertaining to traditional media, the Uniform Single Publications Act, provides that a claim for defamation relief only applies to the first publication; later circulation of the original story doesn’t trigger new claims. The 7th Circuit ruled that excluding online stories from the statute would “expose online publishers to potentially limitless liability.” Thus, the court found that online publishers shouldn’t be punished for not altering its allegedly incorrect stories.


For more sports-related news from InsideCounsel, read:

5 of the summer's biggest sports lawsuits

Former NFL players sue the league

NCAA will not renew contract with EA Sports

Super Bowl 2011 fans can’t pursue class action

Contributing Writer

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.