Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Chinese court hands down milestone IP ruling

Shanghai worker for Eli Lilly and Co. forced to pay 20 million yen for stealing trade secrets

A Shanghai court recently issued China’s first ban on trade secrets, which has been called a landmark ruling for intellectual property worldwide.

Eli Lilly and Co., a pharmaceutical company based in Indianapolis, alleged that a former research center employee with the last name Huang downloaded 21 secret documents without authorization. The company says Huang had signed a confidentiality agreement and was legally obligated not to disclose confidential and proprietary information. The company fired Huang upon discovering the downloads, but he refused to delete or return the secret documents.

Lilly sued for an injunction to prevent Huang from using and circulating these trade secrets, and it also asked for compensation of 20 million yuan ($3.3 million). The company also asked for custody of these secrets to prevent possible losses before the case hearing opened.

Judge Liu Junhua ruled in favor of Lilly, the first intellectual property victory of its kind since the Chinese government enacted a revised Civil Procedure Law on Jan. 1. Liu told Chinese-language newspaper Legal Daily: “[T]rade secrets as a kind of intellectual property rights were not properly protected under judicial practices for a long time,” and that the Civil Procedure Law has filled the gap in protection of trade secrets.

According to China Daily, the court’s ruling should establish a precedent in similar cases nationwide.


For more about intellectual property cases, check out these recent InsideCounsel articles:

Technology: The legal issues of advertising online and through social media

U.S. not doing enough to protect against patent trolls, survey says

IP: Trolls to freeze in their tracks? Not likely.

IP: First three Legal Rights Objection decisions released

Zynga sues over “Bang with Friends” app

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.