Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Pampers settlement thrown out over excessive attorney fees

The 6th Circuit rejected a class action lawsuit settlement that would have given roughly 90 percent of settlement funds to the plaintiff’s attorneys

This time, the babies weren’t the only ones crying foul. Last Friday, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals threw out a class action lawsuit settlement plaintiffs reached with Proctor & Gamble Co. (P&G), saying the attorneys who brought the suit were receiving too high a share.

In 2011, P&G agreed to pay $3 million settlement after a few dozen plaintiffs had claimed that Pampers Dry Max diapers caused rashes on babies. The attorneys that brought the suit were to receive $2.73 million of that total. Each of plaintiffs in the suit would receive $1,000 for their troubles.

A Washington nonprofit, the Center for Class Action Fairness, challenged the settlement in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. The 6th Circuit ruling agreed with the nonprofit, saying most Pampers customers who had bought the diapers received little benefit from the agreement. A district court had approved the original settlement.

P&G now has a decision on their hands. They may move to reach a new settlement, or they may also move to dismiss the case entirely. “We appreciate the court’s consideration of the legal issues in this case and we’ll study our options in light of this opinion,” a P&G spokesman said on Monday.


Want more about the Pampers case? Check out The Wall Street Journal for more coverage.

And for more InsideCounsel litigation news, read:

Apple displeased with DOJ e-book court order proposal

Former Green Mountain employee and friend accused of insider trading

California city sues Chevron over refinery fire

11 companies targeted in Quebec train disaster suit

Dukes v. Wal-Mart plaintiffs hit roadblock in California

Assistant Editor

author image

Zach Warren

Zach Warren is Assistant Editor of InsideCounsel magazine, where he oversees online content submissions and administers InsideCounsel's enewsletters. Zach specializes in new media and multimedia...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.