Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by Law.com, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!

X

More On

Apple can’t add Samsung’s Galaxy S4 smartphone to infringement suit

Doing so would be a “tax on the court’s resources,” judge says

Are you getting tired of hearing about the Apple/Samsung patent battle? Turns out, so is the court.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal ruled yesterday that Apple Inc. cannot add Samsung Electronics Co.’s Galaxy S4 smartphone to the list of products Apple claims infringe on its patents. The tech companies are already duking it out over other smartphones, including Samsung’s Galaxy S III and Apple’s iPhone 5.

One of Apple’s lawyers, Josh Krevitt, told the court that if Apple could not include the S4, it would have to file a new lawsuit, because by next year’s trial, the Samsung products currently covered in the lawsuit would be out of date, Bloomberg reports.

Grewal chastised the parties for their dragged-out court drama in his ruling, one can only imagine feeling quite beleaguered as he did so. To add another product to the dispute would be a “tax on the court’s resources,” he wrote. “Each time these parties appear in the courtroom, they consume considerable amounts of the court’s time and energy, which takes time way from other parties who also require and are entitled to the court’s attention.”

 

Read ever more and more about the Apple/Samsung drama on InsideCounsel:

Japanese court finds Samsung did not infringe on Apple synchronization patent

Apple wins UK essential patent claim against Samsung

Technology: Are you an Apple or a Samsung fan?

Apple drops patent claims against Samsung smartphone only sold in Europe

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.