Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


D.C. Circuit dismisses NLRB charges against medical center

Court says president’s comments didn’t violate the NLRA

If the past few months are any indication, it seems the D.C. Circuit has it out for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In January, the appeals court ruled that President Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate and appointed two individuals to fill vacancies on the NLRB in January 2012 during what he thought was a recess break. Since the decision, Republicans have claimed that all the board’s decisions have been invalid since the recess appointments. The controversy also has sparked lawsuits challenging 2012 NLRB decisions.

And last week, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the NLRB erred when it found that an Arizona medical center violated labor laws when it threatened employees and fired a worker during a unionization campaign. The medical center’s president had told employees that if they voted to unionize, they would no longer be negotiating with him directly. The NLRB found that his statements constituted a threat that negotiations with the medical center would completely stop.

On Friday, the D.C. Circuit dropped two charges against the medical center and kept a third related to retaliation. In its opinion, the court said it was “baffled by the Board’s interpretation” of the medical center’s president’s statement. It also disagreed with the NLRB’s finding that the medical center fired an employee for his role in the unionization campaign.

Read Thomson Reuters for more information.

For more recent NLRB news from InsideCounsel, read:

Cases pit Native American sovereignty against NLRB authority

Obama nominates two Biglaw lawyers to NLRB

Contractual class action waiver valid despite NLRB ruling

NLRB sees increase in social media-related cases

D.C. Circuit rules recess appointments unconstitutional

Ashley Post

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.