Cheat Sheet: What GCs need to know about government merger enforcement trends

Experts weigh in on trends in antitrust scrutiny, and give tips on avoiding enforcement actions

The Obama administration has earned a reputation for being tough on big mergers and acquisitions by scuttling deals between companies such as AT&T and T-Mobile, Anheuser Busch InBev and Grupo Modelo, and Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange. But is that reputation really deserved? In InsideCounsel’s May cover story, experts break down trends in merger enforcement by the antitrust agencies and weigh in on whether the current administration has paid special attention to M&As.


Is the Obama administration especially tough on mergers?

Despite numerous media reports to the contrary, experts say that although merger challenges have risen under the Obama administration, the increase is not particularly dramatic. The number of challenges was unusually low during George W. Bush’s presidency: The ratio of enforcement actions to merger filings was 0.75 percent and 0.9 percent in Bush’s first and second terms, respectively, according to the Stanford Law Review.

What is the administration’s record on challenging M&As?

Experts say that both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have increased their litigation staffing, giving them more confidence when challenging deals. In 2011 alone, the DOJ successfully blocked big mergers between H&R Block and TaxAct, Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange, and AT&T and T-Mobile. And it continued the trend in 2013 by challenging Anheuser-Busch InBev’s attempted acquisition of Grupo Modelo, reportedly requiring concessions before the deal could proceed.

What about challenges to completed mergers?

One area in which the government has not been afraid to pursue challenges is that of consummated transactions. Under the Bush administration, the DOJ and FTC challenged a total of 18 completed mergers, while between March 2009 and March 2012, the FTC alone challenged nine completed mergers. This trend could spell bad news for companies, since undoing a completed deal is more expensive and time-consuming than scuttling a merger midway through.

What steps should companies take to avoid merger challenges?

Companies should plan well in advance for the possibility of government scrutiny, and take the following steps to minimize or avoid complications:

Alanna Byrne

Bio and more articles

Associate Editor

Melissa Maleske

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.