Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Supreme Court won’t certify class action lawsuit against Comcast

In a 5-4 decision, the high court found the class was too diverse to accurately measure damages

It’s not a great era for class actions post-Dukes. The Supreme Court delivered another blow to consumers on Wednesday when it ruled that a class action lawsuit against Comcast Corp. did not adequately show how damages could be measured for the entire group.

This ruling is not terribly surprising in light of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, a 2011 case in which the Supreme Court made it more difficult to certify a class action.

The suit, brought by 2 million subscribers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware, accused Comcast of overcharging for its services and stifling competition by changing up coverage areas and buying off rival cable providers, resulting in tripled market share for Comcast.

Comcast argued that the plaintiffs comprised 649 different franchise areas, with different competitive conditions, and shouldn’t be allowed to pursue their claims together.

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed. In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the class was too diverse, both in location and claims raised, and that it fell “far short” of showing damages could be measured for the whole group.

Read more at Thomson Reuters.


For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Supreme Court, see below:

High court hears cases on gay marriage

Supreme Court class arbitration case could have big implications for employers

Supreme Court will decide if state workers can sue for age discrimination under the 14th Amendment

Supreme Court justices warn Congress about sequestration effects

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.