Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


NCAA opposes class cert in antitrust suit

Athletes sued the organization for conspiring against them

Things are heating up between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and some of its basketball and football players.

The case dates back to 2009, when current and former student athletes filed suit against the NCAA, claiming the association conspired against them in an effort not to pay them for their images and likenesses used in video games. The players asked for class action status, and last week, the NCAA filed court papers opposing certification of the class action.

If the NCAA loses its bid to block the cert, it may be pressured to settle the suit, according to Thomson Reuters.

The players are seeking to certify two classes. First, current NCAA Division I men’s basketball and football players who say their images are being used without their permission are seeking injunctive relief. And second, the former student-athletes with the same complaint are asking for monetary damages.

The plaintiffs claim in their suit that the association has created "an illegal horizontal cartel" with member organizations that has "conspired to limit and depress the compensation of former student-athletes for continued use of their images to zero." They also say that the NCAA has illegally commercially benefited from the use of their images.

In its court filing on Thursday, the NCAA said the individuals involved in the suit have too many differences to be allowed to proceed as a class.

Read about more sports-related litigation on InsideCounsel:

Kosher hot dog maker not entitled to sell at Mets’ field on the Sabbath, 2nd Circuit says

Junior Seau’s family sues NFL over brain damage

Lance Armstrong doping scandal sparks litigation

NCAA wants Pennsylvania’s suit over Sandusky dropped

Sportswear company sues International Cycling Union over Armstrong scandal

Litigation: Is poker gambling? One decision may answer that question


Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.