Jury orders J&J to pay $8.3 million over defective hips, company now facing second trial

There were no punitive damages awarded in the first case, and J&J claims it properly warned of risks

Much like the elderly patients the company is catering to, Johnson & Johnson’s hips have been giving it trouble lately.

The company’s DePuy unit recalled its metal ASR artificial hip implants in 2010 and has since faced more than 10,000 lawsuits. The first of those cases to go to trial did not go so well for J&J—the jury awarded plaintiff Loren Kransky $8.3 million in compensatory damages. It could’ve been worse, though. The jury did not hit the company with any punitive damages, finding that DePuy properly warned of the implant’s risks.

Now, on the heels of that ordeal comes a second trial. This case comes from Illinois nurse Carol Strum, who claims that J&J failed to warn of the risks associated with the hip implant. Strum, like Kransky, developed high levels of cobalt and chromium after receiving the implant.

“The company believes the evidence will show ASR XL was properly designed,” Lorie Gawreluk, a spokeswoman for DePuy, told Bloomberg, adding “the product was thoroughly and appropriately reviewed by the FDA.”

 

Follow J&J’s hip problems on InsideCounsel:

Case claims Johnson & Johnson knew about hip implant defects before recall

Government investigates J&J’s hip devices, surgical mesh

Johnson & Johnson concealed hip implant defects, lawyers say

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.