Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Joking Judge says his side job as a comedian is ethical

New Jersey Supreme Court will decide if Judge Vince Sicari can keep telling jokes

It’s one thing for a judge to have a second job to supplement his income, but when that second job is as a successful comic, some in the legal field cry ethics foul. But lawyers for Judge Vince Sicari—who moonlights as a comedian—see it differently, and argued their case in front of a New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday.

In 2008, a state ethics committee ruled that Sicari could no longer work as a paid comedian. Sicari, who goes by the stage name Vince August, makes $13,000 a year as a part-time judge and used the comic gigs to help supplement his income—opening up for shows such as “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart” and “The Colbert Report.”

In court documents appealing the ethics board’s ruling, Sicari claimed “there is never mention in either profession of the other.” He also said he relies on personal observations and his Italian-Catholic upbringing for material.

But despite that fact, the ethics board said some of Sicari’s previous work as a comedian was inappropriate for a sitting judge—citing a stint on the ABC reality show, “What Would You Do?” where he portrayed racist and homophobic characters. Committee members said in court documents that the "content of his comedy routine could give rise to an appearance of bias, partiality or impropriety or otherwise negatively affect the dignity of the judiciary." 

The court did not issue a ruling on Tuesday, but Sicari—who found his calling as a comedian when he was already a practicing lawyer—told the New York Times that if it came down to deciding between the two jobs, he would choose comedy.

Read more InsideCounsel stories about the lighter side of the practice of law.


Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.