Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Anonymous Yelp review admitted as evidence in infringement case

The posting demonstrates that consumers could potentially confuse two similarly named health clubs, a judge ruled

Negative online reviews can scare off potential customers, and now they could land companies in legal hot water, following a judge’s decision to admit an anonymous review from as evidence in an infringement case.

The decision was part of a case involving two competing health club chains. YouFit, a Florida-based health club chain, sued two of its former franchisees for trademark infringement after they opened their own chain of “Fit U” health clubs.

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge James Whittemore granted YouFit’s request for a preliminary injunction. One factor in his decision was an anonymous Yelp review in which a purported gym-goer reported being confused by similarities between the two health clubs. The review reads, in part:

I am soo confused. I was a member at Youfit in [Arizona] and when I moved back to [California] I saw this place by my house and thought great my gym is here! When I went into the gym, I realized it was called Fit U. They use the same basic color scheme on their sign and the motto seemed the same…Seemed very similar to me as when I was a member at Youfit. Very confusing and a big let down.

Whittemore said in his ruling that, although such anonymous postings were not “conclusive evidence of actual confusion, they are indicative of potential consumer confusion.”

Attorneys for Fit U argued that the Yelp posting constituted hearsay, and should not be admitted as evidence. But Whittemore found that the online comment was not hearsay because it was used, not “to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the comment,” but to “demonstrate the consumer’s confusion.”

The Yelp reviewer in question, Scott R., registered for the site last August, and has posted just one review, according to his online profile.

Read more at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.

For more InsideCounsel coverage of Yelp, see:

Companies could face suits for paying for positive online reviews

Village Voice sues Yelp over use of the words “best of”

Yelp-ing Back

Five-Star Success

Alanna Byrne

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.