E-discovery: 4 tips on cost effectively responding to a litigation hold

Lessen the financial burden imposed on your company while avoiding monetary and other court imposed sanctions

In today’s modern economy, corporations are faced with many challenging new issues, not the least of which is minding their bits and bytes. Most of us, if not all, by now, have been confronted with a litigation hold and the challenges they can generate. But in case you are just awakening from a Rip Van Winkle-like nap, a litigation hold is a written notice advising corporations and custodians of electronically stored information (ESI) to preserve potentially relevant records and information that pertain to pending or anticipated litigation.

So with that refresher, the important question is: How do you cost effectively respond to a litigation hold? After all, litigation, especially electronic discovery in hotly contested litigation, can become quite expensive. As in-house counsel, you are responsible to effectively manage these costs and the company’s exposure. Below are a few tips to help you in this regard and at the same time assist in preserving the company’s bottom line:

1. Be Prompt. The duty to preserve information immediately arises upon receipt of a complaint or notice of a lawsuit, receipt of a subpoena as a third-party to an existing lawsuit, receipt of a formal order of investigation from a regulatory body, or knowledge of a potential claim. Failure to timely institute and maintain a litigation hold can have serious consequences, including monetary penalties, adverse jury instructions, preclusion of evidence, and in the worst cases, default judgment or dismissal. Pension Committee of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities. In other words, the worst thing—and potentially most costly thing—you can do is delay.

2. Define Scope. A typical litigation hold letter describes the litigation and the type of evidence that should be preserved. Be sure to understand the scope of the evidence that may become subject to the litigation, and identify the key personnel in your company affected by the litigation hold. Once you understand the scope, respond in writing (or have your counsel do so) stating the measures you are taking to identify and preserve relevant information. Responding in writing provides you with the important opportunity to establish the parameters of what you consider relevant and responsive to the litigation hold, and helps to shift the burden to the opposing party to articulate why those parameters should be broader. In addition, opening such dialogue with the opposing party creates a forum for reaching agreements as to the relevant scope early in the process which has proven to save companies both time and money. Obviously, the narrower the scope, the less costly and burdensome.

3. Have A Plan. Have an action plan in place for handling litigation holds and designate a team, including an IT professional, to be responsible for litigation holds. The litigation hold team should be able to promptly initiate the litigation hold action plan and work with key personnel involved in the litigation to identify the custodians of relevant records and notify them of the litigation hold. Keep in mind that relevant evidence may exist in paper or in today’s world more likely electronic form, and may be located in several places, including: employee files and workspaces, document warehouses; employee homes; emails and voicemails (both corporate and personal); company network storage; computer hard drives and external hard drives (both corporate and personal); corporate back-up tapes; and cellular telephones, PDA’s, and smart phones. Having a designated IT professional on your team who is knowledgeable in responding to litigation holds will help you manage the company’s exposure in the litigation and minimize disruptions to the general workforce.

4. Involve Others. Receipt of a litigation hold is, at a minimum, an obligation to preserve documents, and more likely, is notice of an impending lawsuit. Accordingly, you should immediately advise your liability insurer of possible litigation to avoid notice issues. Furthermore, inform your legal counsel, as he or she can help you frame the scope of potentially relevant information, respond to the party that sent the litigation hold, and assist you in documenting the steps you need to take to preserve relevant ESI. Finally, if your company is small or you do not have an IT professional who can be responsible for litigation holds, consider hiring a qualified ESI consultant. While the upfront cost of ESI consultants sometimes deters small companies from being proactive when faced with a litigation hold, such consulting costs have proven to represent a fraction of those costs and penalties that await the company that fails to take the necessary steps to comply with a litigation hold.

In sum, be proactive, not only in responding to a litigation hold, but in your day-to-day operations. When you are not subject to a litigation hold, review and update your company’s document retention policy, be efficient in your records retention practices, ensure your company’s policies and procedures are routinely followed, and have a plan to handle litigation holds, including designating a team to be responsible for litigation holds.

Litigation and discovery present a myriad of challenges for in-house counsel and these challenges typically are associated with high price tags. But by following these practical steps, you can lessen the financial burden imposed on your company while also avoiding monetary and other court imposed sanctions.

Page 2 of 2
About the Author
William T. Eveland

William T. Eveland

William T. “Toby” Eveland is a partner at Arnstein & Lehr LLP’s Chicago office. His practice focuses on business and class action litigation, premises and product liability defense, and complex insurance disputes. He has been named a 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 Illinois Rise Star, and is a 2011 recipient of the National LGBT Bar Association’s Best LGBT Lawyers under 40 Award.

About the Author
Christopher S. Naveja

Christopher S. Naveja

Christopher S. Naveja is a partner at Arnstein & Lehr, LLP’s Chicago office, is the Co-Chair of the firm’s Consumer Finance Litigation Practice Group, and is an active member of the firm’s Commercial Litigation Practice Group. Mr. Naveja has extensive experience representing clients in complex commercial, business tort, insurance coverage, and class action litigation, and is a frequent author and speaker on issues involving electronic discovery and consumer finance. 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.