Australian High Court says Google is not responsible for search result ads

The landmark decision found that Google did not engage in misleading or deceptive conduct

Things are looking up Down Under for Google. Australia’s High Court issued a landmark ruling on Wednesday in favor of the company, unanimously finding that its sponsored links were not misleading, and that it was not responsible for what its advertisements said.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission had accused Google of misleading and deceptive conduct related to advertisements, based on search results in which a search for Honda Australia displayed a paid advertisement for CarSales, one of Honda’s competitors. Google claimed that it was merely a channel for the advertisements, not a publisher, and wasn’t responsible for them.

While a lower court initially ordered Google to set up a compliance program to keep misleading advertisements off of its search results, the High Court overturned that ruling, writing "Ordinary and reasonable users of the Google search engine would have understood that the representations conveyed by the sponsored links were those of the advertisers, and would not have concluded that Google adopted or endorsed the representations."

Though this ruling only applies to Australia, it sets the stage for a worldwide debate on the issue, as Google has faced similar challenges in other countries. In the U.S., the company settled a dispute with Rosetta Stone in November 2012, in which the language software company accused Google of selling its trademarks to third-party advertisers to use as search keywords.

Read more at Thomson Reuters.

 

For more InsideCounsel coverage of Google, see below:

Google/FTC deal will affect future technology patent disputes

Google, FTC reach settlement

Libraries win in Google Books infringement suit

FTC staff reportedly recommends antitrust lawsuit against Google

Google, publishers agree to e-book settlement

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.