Microsoft accused of violating patents with its Bing search engine

I/P Engine claims that Microsoft willfully violated its parent company’s patents

In a lawsuit filed on Thursday, I/P Engine Inc. accused Microsoft Corp. of infringing patents in the generation of ads and related links for its Bing search engine.

I/P Engine claims that Microsoft’s search technology is based on the inventions of employees of I/P Engine’s parent company, Vringo Inc. What’s more, I/P Engine claims that Microsoft willfully infringed its patents, which, if the court agrees, could lead to a higher damage award. The suit alleges that Microsoft applied for a similar patent, and when the Patent and Trademark Office rejected it in 2003, it referenced one of the I/P Engine patents in question.

The company has had some success defending these patents against tech giants before—in November 2012, a jury awarded it $30 million in damages, finding that companies like Google Inc. and AOL Inc. had infringed the same patents. Even so, the $30 million award was a fraction of what I/P Engine had sought. The company originally was seeking $696 million in damages.

Read more at Reuters.

 

For more coverage of Microsoft on InsideCounsel, see below:

Apple, Microsoft, Facebook team up on app privacy initiative

Microsoft, Motorola Mobility seek to keep trade secrets private after trial

Microsoft GC named chair-elect of Leadership Council on Legal Diversity

Microsoft wins text-messaging lawsuit against Motorola Mobility

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.