Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

McDonald’s pays $700,000 to settle suit over non-halal food

Two Detroit-area restaurants allegedly advertised halal fare, but sold products that did not conform to Islamic dietary restrictions

McDonald’s Corp. is in hot water over its food, but the problem this time isn’t calorie counts—it’s the restaurant’s alleged failure to comply with Muslim dietary law, despite its advertising to the contrary.

The fast food chain advertises halal food at two of its locations near Dearborn, Mich., which is home to one of the country’s largest Arab and Muslim communities. Local resident Ahmed Ahmed brought the suit against McDonald’s and one of its franchise owners, Finley’s Management Co., in November 2011, two months after he ordered a chicken sandwich at one of those locations and allegedly discovered that it wasn’t halal.

Ahmed’s lawyer claims that the restaurant sold non-halal food when it ran out of halal products. Islamic dietary requirements prohibit the consumption of pork and call for God’s name to be invoked before an animal is slaughtered.

The settlement applies to any customer who bought purported halal products from the two Michigan locations between September 2005 and last Friday. But because of the difficulty of identifying these individuals, both sides have reportedly agreed to pay much of the settlement money to local charities that benefit Muslims, with about $270,000 going to a Detroit free clinic, roughly $150,000 going to the Arab American National Museum, $230,000 to lawyers and $20,000 to Ahmed.

McDonald’s did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement. Finley’s Management said in a statement that it has a “carefully designed system” for preparing halal products, and that it trains its employees on that process.

Read more at the Washington Post.

For more religion-based lawsuits on InsideCounsel, see:

7 unhappy holiday lawsuits

Hobby Lobby loses appeal of contraception coverage

“Innocence of Muslims” actress sues filmmaker and Google

Kosher certification group sues dairy for unofficial markings

Lingerie store employee fired for offending owners with her outfits

Muslim woman wins discrimination verdict against Southwestern Bell

Alanna Byrne

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.