Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Supreme Court will hear law firms’ appeals in Allen Stanford case

Firms say SLUSA precludes investors’ class actions

Two law firms are heading to battle as defendants in the high court.

On Friday, the Supreme Court accepted appeals from Chadbourne & Parke and Proskauer Rose, two law firms that once represented R. Allen Stanford, a convicted Ponzi schemer who a judge last year sentenced to 110 years behind bars. Stanford swindled investors out of more than $7 billion over 20 years. Chadbourne and Proskauer are seeking to avoid state-law suits that Stanford’s investors, seeking to recoup their losses, brought against them.

The lawsuits seek to hold the two law firms responsible for the actions of Thomas Sjoblom, a lawyer who worked at both firms and who the investors claim obstructed a Securities and Exchange Commission probe into Stanford.

The firms, however, claim that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA)—which prevents plaintiffs from filing state-law class actions alleging fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of nationally traded securities—preclude the plaintiffs’ suits.

A district court judge ruled in October 2011 that SLUSA preempted the plaintiffs’ suits. But in March 2012, the 5th Circuit reversed the decision, finding that the fraud was only tangentially related to the investors’ securities purchases.

After the 5th Circuit’s decision, which created a significant split among the circuits, experts predicted the case would head to the Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court in the past few terms has been much more active in getting involved in securities cases and class actions,” Neal Marder, a partner at Winston & Strawn, told InsideCounsel in June 2012. “This may very well provide the opportunity for the Supreme Court to intervene and decide in a more uniform way what ‘in connection with’ is intended to mean under SLUSA.”

The Supreme Court could hear the appeal in April and will likely deliver a decision by the end of June.

Read Thomson Reuters for more information.

For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Stanford case, read:

R. Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years in prison

Federal securities law doesn't preclude state law class actions

Investors file suit against Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke

R. Allen Stanford investors, looking to recoup their losses, are targeting his former outside counsel

Ashley Post

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.