Pfizer settles Wyeth’s Protonix suit

Pharma giant will pay $55 million plus interest to end case

Pfizer Inc. said yesterday that it will shell out $55 million to bring to an end to litigation surrounding Protonix, an acid reflux drug that Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer, produced and marketed in the early 2000s.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) had accused Wyeth of marketing Protonix for unapproved uses and says the pharmaceutical company also made claims about the drug that had not been proved. The DOJ says the questionable marketing of Protonix occurred between February 2000 and June 2001. Pfizer purchased Wyeth for $68 billion in 2009.

The DOJ says Wyeth trained its sales team to promote Protonix to treat all forms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), but the Food and Drug Administration had only approved the drug for GERD that is diagnosed via endoscopy. Promoting it for all forms of GERD, the DOJ contends, opened Protonix up to a vastly wider market.

"Wyeth tried to cheat the system by obtaining a limited FDA approval for Protonix, fully intending to promote this drug for additional, unapproved uses," U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz said in a statement.

Read more about this case on Thomson Reuters.

For more InsideCounsel coverage of the pharmaceutical industry, see:

Supreme Court takes up design-defect drug case

Supreme Court will rule on gene patentability

Canada Supreme court strikes down Pfizer’s Viagra patent

Gene case a big win for biotech industry

Mayo v. Prometheus cuts back on patentable inventions

Circuit split reignites debate over reverse payments

IP: Generic manufacturers win in the Supreme Court

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.