Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Lucasfilm wins appeal of $1.2 million pregnancy discrimination verdict

According to the appeals court, the trial judge gave improper instructions to jury members in the original case

The force was with Lucasfilm Ltd. Monday, when a California appeals court overturned a $1.2 million pregnancy discrimination verdict against the company.

Julie Veronese sued the production company, which owner George Lucas recently sold to Walt Disney Co. for $4.05 billion, for allegedly rescinding a job offer after she told a prospective supervisor shortly before her start date that she was pregnant. In 2010, jurors awarded Veronese $93,800 for lost wages, $20,000 for emotional distress and $1.16 million in attorneys’ fees.

But a three-judge panel reversed the $1.2 million award and remanded the decision to the trial court for a retrial, after it found that the jury had received improper instruction from the trial judge, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. According to the appeals court, the judge should have told jurors that Lucasfilm could not be held liable for a nondiscriminatory error in business judgment.

The trial judge had also instructed jurors that concerns about a fetus’s health do not justify discrimination. According to the appeals court, that statement could have disadvantaged Lucasfilm, since Veronese’s supervisor warned her about fumes and other potential hazards at the company.

For more pregnancy-related lawsuits on InsideCounsel, see:

Dangerous delivery

ADAAA could soon protect pregnant workers

Former “Price is Right” model wins $777,000 in pregnancy lawsuit

Hobby Lobby must cover morning-after pill, judge rules

Firing of pregnant first-year employee ruled illegal

Woman sues birth control pill maker for unintended pregnancy

Alanna Byrne

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.