Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


CPSC sues Nap Nanny maker

Baby recliners were involved in five infant deaths

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has filed a complaint against a children’s product manufacturer claiming its baby recliners were responsible for the deaths of five infants.

In a press release announcing its suit, the commission says Pennsylvania-based Baby Matters’ Nap Nanny and Nap Nanny Chill foam-rubber recliners designed for sleeping, resting and playing have defects in “design, warnings and instructions, which pose a substantial risk of injury and death to infants.” The complaint seeks an order requiring that Baby Matters notify the public of the defects and offer full refunds to consumers.

The CPSC says five babies’ deaths have involved Nap Nannies. The commission also has received more than 70 other incident reports of babies nearly falling out of the product.

“My heart goes out to the parents and families of children who are injured or lose their lives in incidents associated with consumer products,” CPSC Commissioner Nancy Nord said in a statement.

In a statement responding to the CPSC’s suit, Baby Matters Owner Leslie Gudel said “the fact that infants have died ‘while using’ the Nap Nanny improperly, such as when used in a crib where the child could suffocate on a crib bumper or a blanket, does not mean our product caused the child’s death or is hazardous.” She added that “Nap Nanny went to great lengths to make the safest product possible.” 

Baby Matters recalled an earlier version of the Nap Nanny in July 2010. The company offered consumers $80 coupons toward the purchase of a newer model, which had improved instructions and warnings.

Read CNN and Reuters for more information.

Read more InsideCounsel stories about product liability:

States launch investigation into sales of Boston Scientific surgical mesh

Parents of dead teen sue Monster Beverage Corp.

Chinese drywall maker to face U.S. lawsuits over allegedly faulty product

Costa Concordia passengers file new complaint

Ashley Post

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.