Racial discrimination case against “The Bachelor” dismissed

Judge says show’s producers are protected by the First Amendment

A federal judge has dismissed a suit two black men filed against ABC, claiming the network engaged in racial discrimination when it did not cast them in the “The Bachelor” or “The Bachelorette,” two popular reality series.

The two men—Nathaniel Claybrooks and Christopher Johnson—claimed in their suit that in 10 years and 23 combined seasons, no person of color has ever been cast in either show. In addition to ABC, their suit targeted Warner Horizon Television, Next Entertainment, NZK Productions and the shows’ executive producer, Mike Fleiss.

But U.S. District Judge Aleta Trauger dismissed the case on Monday, saying that while the two men had a “laudable” goal in filing the suit, the show’s producers—protected by the First Amendment—have a right to control their creative content. She went on to explain, for example, that freedom of speech in media allowed “The Cosby Show” to have an all-black cast and “Jersey Shore” to cast all Italian-Americans.

"We felt from the outset this case was completely without merit and we are pleased the court has found in our favor," WB Entertainment spokesman Paul McGuire told TMZ yesterday.

Read more about this story on Thomson Reuters.

For more InsideCounsel stories about this case and other Hollywood suits, check out:

5 celebrity lawsuits in the news

Celebrity fan sites fined for COPPA violations

6 celebrity lawsuits in the news

CBS drops suit against ABC over similar show

CBS sues ABC over copycat show

ABC’s “The Bachelor” sued for racial bias

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.