Americans doubt fairness of civil courts, admit bias against corporations

Perhaps a lack of faith in the justice system comes from knowing they themselves would be biased as jurors

Justice is supposed to be blind, and while the venerable Lady is often depicted with a cloth covering her eyes to show her objectivity, a troubling new study suggests Americans aren’t buying it.

Langer Research Associates of New York conducted a poll for the Defense Research Institute (DRI), surveying a random, scientific sample of adults across the nation. The study found that many Americans are doubtful about the fairness of civil courts—41 percent, to be exact. Only 9 percent of respondents were “very confident” that civil courts are “just and fair,” and 83 percent said whichever side gives more money to its lawyers typically wins.

Perhaps the reason respondents didn’t perceive courts as fair is because they admit that they would be biased jurors. In a dispute between a corporation and an individual, 54 percent of those surveyed said they would favor the individual. Respondents showed a particular bias against insurance, oil and financial companies, while technology and automobile companies were viewed somewhat less harshly. If they had a bad consumer experience with a company in the past, 52 percent said that would influence their decision.

Surprising no one, politics does come into play. An average 68 percent of Democrats and liberals said they would favor an individual over a corporation, while only 43 percent of Republicans and conservatives said they would.

Read more results from the study at DRI’s website.

 

For more important legal industry stats on InsideCounsel, see below:

Jobs up in legal services sector

Companies increase legal spending, both in U.S. and abroad

Facts & Figures: More companies extend equal benefits to transgender employees

Study says Biglaw profits look “grim” for 2012

Facts & Figures: General counsel rank data security as top concern

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.